![]() ![]() ![]() We don't see people complain about cut-offs for video cards or chipset drivers, as the vast majority of users have already moved on to new hardware. It gets to a point were a manufacturer doesn't have a choice but to cut driver support for the hardware. but yet, people that own these *antique* audio cards still seem to think "if it ain't broke don't fix it." I mean, you can't exactly get by anymore on a Pentium II, nor a VooDoo3 anymore. What other form of PC hardware recieves support from the manufacturer for so long, and what other forms of hardware are still capable of handling the modern PC workload? Very few compared to those still using "out-dated" audio cards. People are still complaining about the cut-off on the driver support (although Creative have still released a couple more XP driver updates since), on cards that are nearing 10 years old. I mean, c'mon - the PC world had moved through WIN 2000/ME, through XP, and was already into Vista, and people were complaining about losing support for a card that was initially designed for WIN98. Seriously, the amount of bitching people did when they cut support for the Live! series. why do you feel they should support cards that are over 10 years old? I've brought this up so many countless times before. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |